What’s good folks – it’s that time once again to reach into the J4G Mailbag and see what’s in there. This week’s letter comes from a newcomer to J4G, a reader by name of Mr. Ferrum Itzal, who proffers a highly provocative premise: that Women, taken together as a group, do what they do because of inherent feelings of inferiority in comparison to Men – and it is this, that undergirds the Feminist Project.

Something tells me this is gonna be a braburner barnburner of a post.

So, without further ado, here’s Mr. Ferrum!

“Really enjoyed reading your piece on Charles Ramsey getting crucified in the media. Overall, the Russian Mates site has been refreshing.

One of the fundamental problems with the men’s rights movements is their ignoring what drives women in the first place.

If my observations are correct, and I have every reason to believe so, we’re battling a deep, subconscious feeling of inferiority that drives women to do everything they can to demean men. They recognize their general reliance on men, their helplessness in the face of violence, and hate men for it. They might not be conscious of it, but it’s still there.

Women’s groups will tell you all day long that women have been enslaved and oppressed since the dawn of time. They have been forcibly removed from education and politics throughout history.

But what does that really mean?

Well, it means that all of the great works of history were designed and built by men. According to them, women had no role in it whatsoever. And while I might be fine with that (I didn’t have a role in it, either!), women hate the idea that they didn’t build the Roman Coliseum or the Pyramids of Giza. Women didn’t write the greatest works of literature. Women didn’t discover gravity or planetary movement around the sun. Women didn’t discover great new lands or invent all the great things that made civilization what it is today.

If you look at things today, women didn’t build the cities. Women didn’t build the bridges or cut the roads through the mountains. Look at any construction site and count the number of women slaving away under the hot summer sun. Yet, they will have us believe that they are our equal? How so?

Find an accomplished female architect and she will readily admit that she’s never actually pounded a nail or cut lumber. She got a degree and a lot of book smarts, just like any guy would, but she’s never carried a bundle of shingles up a ladder.

Find an accomplished female scientist in a lab and she’ll have to admit that she’s working in a building of brick and stone laid in mortar by men. She drove to work on roads built and maintained by men.

And neither of them can show where they are doing something that men are not also doing, or are not capable of doing. For every successful woman, there is an equally successful male that does the same thing to the same standard.

That underlying sense of inferiority gnaws at them.

But women will tell you that they can do anything a man can do?

Is that why they demand that the standards be lowered for them? Women in the military don’t get their heads shaved…. why? Women that try to become police don’t have to do the same number of exercises that men do….. but they ignore all of the millions of males that also couldn’t pass those standards and got bounced out of the academy. They didn’t demand that the standards be lowered over the entire program, only that the standard for women be lowered. They didn’t demand that all the males previously bounced out be given another try. Isn’t that the very definition of non-equal?

Every time they demand a different standard for them, they are acknowledging that they are not men’s equals…. and it tears them up inside. They know deep down that they rely on men far more than men rely on them, and they hate it.

In a recent piece I penned on another site, I noted that there is absolutely nothing I need a woman for outside of sex. Nothing that a woman does cannot be done by myself or another man – except for the pussy. That’s it. As Jack Donovan noted, the manliest of alpha males does the most “gender biased” housekeeping chores while in the middle of a combat zone. The manliest man in the manliest of environments… and he’s cooking dinner, washing clothes and keeping his “home” as clean and neat as circumstances allow. Men all around the world are doing the same thing simply as a part of life.

So why do we need a woman? As women’s rights groups have said time and again, men can build entire civilizations, pen the most wonderful poetry, invent machines that revolutionize the entire globe. Men have proven that they can tend a house, grow a garden, mend clothes, run a vacuum cleaner, etc. So, what value does a woman have in the grand scheme of things?

I would argue that not only do women have little value, but that they know it and hate it. That is why they demean men left and right. They are trying to bring them down to their level.

As you noted in your piece on Charles Ramsey, they couldn’t simply accept that a man rescued a woman. They didn’t paint him as a troubled soul redeeming himself and saving three young women. Instead, the feminist media stripped him of any honor gained by highlighting past misdeeds that had nothing to do with his actions that day. The captive women spent ten years without being able to escape, a black eye for the “empowered feminist” mindset.

This subconscious sense of inferiority is why you see them clamoring for more women CEO’s and not more women in the ditches with the guys. More women cops and lawyers and firefighters – all glamorous, sexy roles that have an element of power and prestige. Entry-level positions that allow them to move up the power ladder.

And they never mention the damage caused by destroying the family or putting under-strength people in a position where strength is needed. No mention of the fact that male firefighters still have to do all the heavy lifting when it comes to battling a blaze.

The women know that, and they hate it. Every time they try to prove that they can make it in a man’s world, wherever that might be, they demonstrate that they actually can’t do it unless the deck is stacked in their favor.

Need more proof? Look at the number of women that are against the legalization of prostitution. How could a woman be pro-choice, but against prostitution when it’s nothing more than a woman deciding what to do with her reproductive system. See Roe v. Wade for more on that.

In a recent case, look at the backlash from women over Belle Knox’s decision to make porn films to pay her way through Duke U. All this talk over a woman’s right to choose, yet here are millions of women ripping Belle to shreds over her choice to fuck for money. Why?

Because the pussy is the only card that women have. Men want pussy. Men do not want to have to take a woman on five dates, get played like a chump, and walk away with nothing. But as long as the only legal way to get pussy (and the only way to be sure of getting reasonably clean pussy) is to go through the mating dance, women have the upper hand. They want the upper hand desperately.

Make prostitution and pornography as mainstream as Starbucks and Cosmo, however, and you undermine their monopoly on the product. What beta male is going to spend weeks chasing a girl when he can just go down to the corner brothel and get a clean, classy hooker for an hour? Yea, it might cost the same as two or three dates, but it’s also a guaranteed thing. Regulated brothels also tend to have medical check-ups regularly so you know you’re not catching anything. You can’t say that about “regular” women!

And if these beta males get angry and rape a woman, that works in their favor. It gives them ammunition to further demonize men. Women’s groups know that rape decreases when legalized prostitution is available, but keeping it illegal only helps their cause.

Linda M. Rio Reichmann, JD, an undergraduate student at the time of the quote, who later became Director of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Child Custody Pro Bono Project, stated in an Apr. 1991 Archives of Sexual Behavior article titled “Psychological and Sociological Research and the Decriminalization or Legalization of Prostitution”:

“A study conducted in Queensland… show[ed] a 149% increase in the rate of rape when legal brothels were closed in 1959, while other offenses against the person by males increased only 49%.”

The quoted study isn’t new. The information has been out there for decades, but you have to make sacrifices to support the cause. After all, the women in charge aren’t the one’s that are going to be raped. It’s the young attractive women out on the streets that are getting thrown to the wolves, not the ugly old hags sitting in their gated communities.

Women’s groups can’t stop the mainstreaming of sex now that the internet is out in force. So what can they do? Try to stack the deck even further in their favor. That’s what we’re seeing now, but the underlying cause that drives this behavior is important.

Women don’t want equality; they want supremacy. For once in their history, they want to be the top dog that everyone will look back on as having created something awe-inspiring.

Keep up the good work.

Ferrum”

Well, there it is, folks! Mr. Ferrum ain’t playing. Have at it – what do you make of his argument? Ladies, what do you in particular have to say?

References:

Men Behaving Badly, and the Women who Love/Hate Them

Is The Ratcheted Life Worth Living? Living Contradictions And Their Consequences

What the Greeks and Plato Thought About ALPHA

Why The Other Guys Always Get The Girls

The Dating Game Vs Girl Game

I Don’t Kiss On The First Date

How To Handle A Nuclear Rejection In The Age Of Social Media

The Complex Nature of Sexiness and Its Impact On The Dating Game

How Women Can Stay Visible And Attractive As They Age

What Radical Honesty In Modern Dating Would Really Look Like